“The Warm Blanket” is how many opioid users describe the feeling of being under the drugs’ influence. Orally or injected, and regardless of the reason(s) the drugs may be taken, this description has been documented across the user spectrum. PAINKILLER LAW’s position on prescription drug abuse is that even if a patient or an addicted person – or an addicted patient – needs the warm blanket, that does not necessarily mean criminal or civil liability should rest with a prescribing healthcare provider. In other words, in all but the most extreme cases, the blanket is warm, but the trail back to the ultimate question of “why?” is appropriately cold.
And speaking of “cold,” I don’t mean to sound cold or heartless saying that. Grieving parents of deceased addicted children need comfort, not a lecture. None the less, it is true that healthcare providers are generally NOT to blame for prescription drug abuse. Here’s an example:
This past Thanksgiving Day in Minneapolis, two teens broke into a man’s home to steal prescription medication. They weren’t looking for iPads or a flatscreen TV or even cash; they wanted pills. The homeowner shot both teens dead. For reasons not yet fully disclosed by police, he’s being charged with murder. But my focus is the teen burglars.
Let’s assume the teens were addicted to prescription pills, let’s say opioids. They committed the crime to feed their habit one way or another, either by planning to ingest the drugs themselves, or by selling them to buy other drugs for personal use. Let’s further assume that the teens were first prescribed opioids by a legitimate healthcare provider. They became addicted over time; to not feed the habit now would bring on the days-long agony of withdrawal.
Who is liable for the burglary? The teens; they did it. Who, if anyone, is liable for the act of killing them? The homeowner, if he can’t claim self-defense, which you’d expect he’d be able to do. But if the homeowner is charged, can he defend himself by blaming the doctor who prescribed the opiates to the teens? Is there a causative link between the prescriptions, and addiction-fueled criminal behavior, sufficient to excuse the homeowner from killing them? Should the healthcare provider be sued by the teens’ parents for wrongful death at the hands of the homeowner? Should the healthcare provider’s act of prescribing be criminalized, independent of the burglary or murder case? Should the very act of having written scrips for these teens end up with a doctor, or osteopath, or physician’s assistant, or nurse practitioner, stripped of their license and doing hard time? Would a healthcare provider still be liable if the teens had not committed a crime?
There are already some states, like Florida, which criminalize “overprescription,” if anyone can define it, and I’d challenge you to come up with a durable, scientific and constitutional definition. Then there’s my state, California, whose law conveniently doesn’t define “overprescribing” but whose law enforcement agencies still try and charge it. And there’s a national law enforcement drumbeat to “do something” about prescription drug abuse by targeting legitimate healthcare providers writing reasonable prescriptions for approved drugs.
What are your answers to the questions above? My answer to all of them is an emphatic “no.” And even if reasonable people can disagree, that only means the issues are too complicated for law enforcement agencies to handle prescription drug abuse as though this were a straightforward issue with an easy remedy. As the old saying goes, “For every complex problem, there’s a simple solution, and it’s wrong.”